Status: Investigating claims · Last updated November 2026
If you were hurt by a robotic arm, an automated guided vehicle or other robotic equipment at work, you may have a claim beyond workers’ compensation. Workers’ comp usually limits what you can recover from your employer. It does not stop you from suing the company that designed, built or installed a defective robot, and those claims can be far more valuable.
At Wieand Parker Arreola, we are investigating injuries caused by industrial and warehouse robots. This page explains how these injuries happen, who can be held responsible and who may qualify. Call (215) 666-7777 for a free, confidential case review.
Factories and warehouses across Pennsylvania and New Jersey increasingly rely on robotic arms, autonomous mobile robots, automated storage systems and collaborative robots (“cobots”) that work beside people. Automation can take over dangerous tasks, but it also creates new hazards. A 2024 study of federal workplace safety data identified dozens of robot-related incidents causing worker injuries, many of them severe.
Common causes include:
These incidents often cause crush injuries, amputations, fractures and head trauma.
In 2025, a robotics technician sued Tesla and robot maker FANUC America for $51 million. He alleges a robotic arm at Tesla’s Fremont, California factory suddenly released with tremendous force while he helped disassemble it, knocking him unconscious. The lawsuit claims FANUC negligently designed the equipment and that Tesla failed to make sure the robot was safely de-energized. It also alleges the robot was placed in an area not designed for such equipment and that new safety protocols were adopted afterward. Tesla has argued that workers’ compensation bars the claims against it. The case shows how injured workers pursue both the employer and the equipment maker.
Beyond your employer, claims may be brought against:
These are called third-party claims, and they are not limited by workers’ compensation rules. Learn more about our work injury, industrial accident and warehouse accident practices.
These are the main factors we review:
Equipment is often repaired, modified or reprogrammed soon after an accident. Ask that the robot and its logs be preserved, write down what happened and who was there, and keep copies of any reports. We can send preservation demands to your employer and the equipment makers.
Usually not directly, because workers’ compensation is the main remedy against an employer. You can often sue the robot manufacturer and other third parties.
You can generally pursue both. Workers’ comp may have a lien on part of a third-party recovery, which we handle as part of the case.
Your actions will be considered, but they do not automatically bar a product liability claim. Many safety systems are meant to protect against foreseeable mistakes.
If you were hurt by robotic or automated equipment at work, contact Wieand Parker Arreola for a free, confidential case review. If we take your case, you pay no fee unless we recover compensation for you. See our self-driving and robotics claims, related humanoid robot injury cases and all of our technology and AI claims.
Call (215) 666-7777 or contact us online for a free case review.
This article is for general information only and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Information is current as of November 2026 and may change.