Status: Investigating claims · Last updated November 2026
If you rent an apartment in a large building, your rent may have been set with help from software that pooled confidential pricing data from competing landlords. Renters, the U.S. Department of Justice and state attorneys general have alleged that this kind of “algorithmic pricing” let landlords coordinate and push rents higher, in violation of antitrust law. Some of those cases have now produced settlements.
At Wieand Parker Arreola, we are investigating claims involving algorithmic price-fixing in rental housing and other markets. This page explains how these tools work, recent settlements and who may be affected. Call (215) 666-7777 for a free, confidential case review.
Revenue management software recommends daily rents for available apartments. The lawsuits allege that certain tools did more than analyze the market. According to the complaints:
Antitrust law forbids competitors from agreeing on prices, and the lawsuits argue that sharing sensitive data through a common algorithm can be a form of agreement.
Renter class action. Renters sued RealPage and dozens of large landlords in a consolidated federal case in Tennessee. Many landlords settled. In October 2026, the court gave final approval to settlements totaling about $360 million for renters who lived in buildings that used RealPage’s pricing software between late 2018 and late 2025. The settling landlords also agreed to stop sharing nonpublic pricing data with RealPage. Claims against RealPage itself and non-settling landlords continue. The settlement has a claim-filing deadline, so eligible renters should act promptly.
Government cases. In November 2025, the Justice Department settled its antitrust case against RealPage. The company agreed to stop using current nonpublic data from competing landlords to generate rent recommendations, without paying damages or admitting wrongdoing. Several large landlords have reached their own settlements with the government. Earlier, Greystar, the nation’s largest landlord, agreed to pay $50 million in a class action and $7 million to settle claims by several states.
Local action. Philadelphia is among the cities that have passed ordinances against algorithmic rent-setting, and California and New York have passed state laws restricting it.
Plaintiffs have brought similar algorithmic pricing claims involving hotel rooms, health care payments and other industries. The legal question in each is whether shared software let competitors coordinate prices they would otherwise set independently.
These are the main factors we review:
Not always. Class members can usually file claims directly. A lawyer can help you understand your options, including whether you have claims that the settlement does not cover.
Not necessarily. The lawsuits focus on sharing confidential competitor data to coordinate prices. Philadelphia’s ordinance adds local restrictions.
Businesses can also be harmed by algorithmic price-fixing. Antitrust law generally allows recovery of up to three times actual damages.
If you believe rent-setting software or another pricing algorithm inflated what you paid, contact Wieand Parker Arreola for a free, confidential case review. If we take your case, you pay no fee unless we recover compensation for you. See our AI decisions and algorithmic harm claims, related algorithmic discrimination cases, our other class action and mass tort cases and all of our technology and AI claims.
Call (215) 666-7777 or contact us online for a free case review.
This article is for general information only and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Litigation details are current as of November 2026 and may change.